On 2017-04-06 18:06, James Almer wrote: > Your numbers are really confusing. Could you post the actual numbers for > each function instead of doing comparisons?
These figures are the actual numbers! Using the figures from Haswell above: > ff_h264_idct_add_8_mmx = 52 cycles > ff_h264_idct_add_8_sse2 = 49 cycles > ff_h264_idct_add_8_avx = 46 cycles Coming back to this draft I saved I removed a fair bit of ranting and cut it down to the essential point. Also, I forgot about the Pentium I tested previous patches on. I added SSE2. From that commit message: > Kaby Lake Pentium: > - ff_h264_idct_add_8_sse2: ~1.18x faster than mmxext > - ff_h264_idct_dc_add_8_sse2: ~1.07x faster than mmxext _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
