On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc > wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:14:42PM -0700, Thomas Turner wrote: > > Reference found at: http://bit.ly/2ogQygb > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Turner <thomas...@googlemail.com> > > --- > > tests/fate/filter-video.mak | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak > > index b067cc1..a154dd2 100644 > > --- a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak > > +++ b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak > > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > > +FATE_FILTER_SAMPLES-$(call ALLYES, SMJPEG_DEMUXER MJPEG_DECODER > PERMS_FILTER OWDENOISE_FILTER) += fate-filter-owdenoise-sample > > > +fate-filter-owdenoise-sample: CMD = ffmpeg -idct simple -i > $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/smjpeg/scenwin.mjpg -vf "trim=duration=1,perms=random, > owdenoise=10:20:20:enable=not(between(t\,2\,3))" -an -f rawvideo - > > if i change this to > enable=not(between(t\,4\,5)) > it still passes, so this part of the filter is not tested > thats likely because of the duration being 1, the enable part needs > to be within the duration > > Okay, will send in patch with updated reference file. Though, the reference file will be approx. 3MB > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Complexity theory is the science of finding the exact solution to an > approximation. Benchmarking OTOH is finding an approximation of the exact > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
