On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Paras Chadha wrote:

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote:


> +static int color_table_compare(const void *lhs, const void *rhs)
> +{
> +    return av_strcasecmp(lhs, ((const ColorEntry *)rhs)->name);
> +}
> +
> +static const ColorEntry color_table[] = {
> +    { "AliceBlue",            { 0xF0, 0xF8, 0xFF } },
> +    { "AntiqueWhite",         { 0xFA, 0xEB, 0xD7 } },
> +    { "Aqua",                 { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF } },
[...]

Is this duplicated from libavutil/parseutils.c?


Yes, it is duplicated from parseutils.c
XPM format also specifies a color None which is transparent, it has been
added to the array.
Also ColorEntry is changed a bit.
These changes are in my next patch.


Why don't you improve the code in parseutils then, and use that? Duplicating code is generally not welcome without a good reason.



> +static uint32_t hexstring_to_rgba(const char *p, int len){
> +    uint32_t ret = 0xFF000000;
> +    const ColorEntry *entry;
> +    char color_name[100];
> +
> +    if(*p == '#'){
> +        p++;
> +        len--;
> +        if (len == 3) {
> +            ret |= (convert(p[2]) <<  4) |
> +                   (convert(p[1]) << 12) |
> +                   (convert(p[0]) << 20);

So is this a modified or redesigned av_parse_color()? Just wondering.


Yes, it is redesigned version of av_parse_color(). It is a bit fast than
the original.

So please integrate your changes in parseutils, and use that if you can, unless there is a reason for the duplication.

Thanks,
Marton
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to