2017-02-25 19:35 GMT+01:00 Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu>: > Instead of this, I'd prefer all patches on the ML.
This would mean we changed from a policy that we successful applied for over a decade to a policy of which we - to the best of my knowledge - know that it does not work well. > Exceptions can be OKish > (e.g. libav merges, which are hard as they are, or very trivial fixes), but > I definitely would not make unreviewed pushes an encouraged and written > policy. I was under the impression that this - luckily - already was written policy. > If this gets pushed, I am inclined to clean up the MAINTAINERS file and > remove everybody who is no longer "active" While a cleanup is of course ok, please note that there MAINTAINERS who are willing to maintain but had no reason to do so for longer than six months. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
