Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-02-21 12:21 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > > On 2/21/17, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2017-02-21 12:07 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > >>> On 2/21/17, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> 2017-02-21 10:59 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > >>>>> Fixes #1849. > >>>> > >>>> The patch changes output for the sample from ticket #1848, is > >>>> this intended? > >>> > >>> Yes. > >> > >> Reference decoder output sounds very different here - more > >> similar without the patch applied. > > > > Similar is not good enough. > > I don't disagree I just thought that worse isn't better. For the rest of us, this isn't helpful. What differences are you seeing? Can you send a before/after sine wave diagram to showcase relevant differences? Or something else that isn't just "it's better!" vs. "it's worse" without any relevant explanation of what you're talking about. (This is a reply to both, not just Carl.) Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
