On 12 February 2017 at 11:33, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le tridi 23 pluviôse, an CCXXV, Rostislav Pehlivanov a écrit : > > This series of commits implements a native Opus encoder. > > That is wonderful news. > > I do not have the knowledge to review the patches themselves. > > But I think they are missing an essential, but fortunately rather easy, > part: user documentation. > > Most importantly, I think it absolutely needs something to tell the user > how it compares to the reference libopus encoder: does it yield better > quality per bitrate? slightly lower quality but incredibly faster? > sometimes better sometimes worst depending on options? > > Hi, For now it'll always yield worse than or equal quality than the reference encoder. The psychoacoustic system will change that, which is what I'm working on. Thanks for the suggestion though, I'll be sure to write an entry to the encoders documentation and especially the wiki, even though the encoder has 1 option right now. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
