Hi community what do you prefer about the ffmpeg-security alias ? in no particular order
Should everyone on the alias be listed in MAINTAINERs under a ffmpeg-security point? Should for everyone who is on the alias a reason be listed in MAINTAINERs why (s)he is on the alias ? Should everyone on the alias have a reason beyond curiousity to be on the alias? (that is a reason that clearly benefits FFmpeg) Should everyone on the alias be a FFmpeg maintainer? Should everyone on the alias be a FFmpeg supporter? (For example not bad-mouthing the project) Should everyone on the alias be required to make a good effort to act in the best interrest of FFmpeg in relation to ffmpeg security ? -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem). On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite number of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
