On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, Marton Balint wrote:
Not starting a new segment if the elapsed microsecs since the start of the day
equals the the elapsed microsecs since the start of the day at the time of the
last cut seems plain wrong to me, Deti do you remember the original reason
behind this check?
Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu>
---
libavformat/segment.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/segment.c b/libavformat/segment.c
index 9d47148..8ec3653 100644
--- a/libavformat/segment.c
+++ b/libavformat/segment.c
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ typedef struct SegmentContext {
int64_t clocktime_offset; //< clock offset for cutting the segments at
regular clock time
int64_t clocktime_wrap_duration; //< wrapping duration considered for
starting a new segment
int64_t last_val; ///< remember last time for wrap around detection
- int64_t last_cut; ///< remember last cut
int cut_pending;
int header_written; ///< whether we've already called
avformat_write_header
@@ -870,10 +869,8 @@ calc_times:
localtime_r(&sec, &ti);
usecs = (int64_t)(ti.tm_hour * 3600 + ti.tm_min * 60 + ti.tm_sec) *
1000000 + (avgt % 1000000);
wrapped_val = (usecs + seg->clocktime_offset) % seg->time;
- if (seg->last_cut != usecs && wrapped_val < seg->last_val && wrapped_val
< seg->clocktime_wrap_duration) {
+ if (wrapped_val < seg->last_val && wrapped_val <
seg->clocktime_wrap_duration)
seg->cut_pending = 1;
- seg->last_cut = usecs;
- }
seg->last_val = wrapped_val;
} else {
end_pts = seg->time * (seg->segment_count + 1);
--
Ping...
Thanks,
Marton
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
