On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:38:23 +0100 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-01-27 10:29 GMT+01:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:19:32 +0100 > > Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> 2017-01-27 10:09 GMT+01:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>: > >> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:39:03 +0100 > >> > Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> 2017-01-27 9:17 GMT+01:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>: > >> >> > >> >> > You're completely misunderstanding. > >> >> > >> >> Would you mind to elaborate? > >> > > >> > FFmpeg shouldn't mux codec-specific tags into a different > >> > container. > >> > >> This is not codec-specific, at least not in the sense that > >> would make a difference for other containers. > >> > >> > Your ffmpeg.c patch works for transcoding only, not remuxing. > >> > >> That's because it makes sense to remux "vendor" metadata. > > > > No, technical metadata that is "hidden" is different from user-visible > > tags that contain non-technical information about the media. > > This is non-technical information that should be user-visible. The vendor tag in your fate change has the value "appl". How should that be user-visible? You can't seriously tell me that this should show up in a non-technical UI view. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
