On 1/8/2017 10:55 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 10:52:52AM -0300, James Almer wrote: >> Also, when moving code in general we expect a patch that makes use of said >> code as part of a set. > > I don't understand. I send a patch where I both make the move and add a > new use. Then I get told to split them into two separate patches and do so; > now I get told that they need to come together? :-) > > /* Steinar */
My bad, I see now this is patch 1 of 2. I didn't notice the second one since it's on a separate thread instead of as a reply to this one. Hence why i mentioned this first patch alone is not of much use. Disregard that part then. Just address the name of the function. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
