Le duodi 2 nivôse, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > Then you're not addressing them
I have: the complexity, in all its details, is necessary because of the next patch. Including the "leaky abstraction", including the O(1) implementation, including the lack of genericness. This is the short and long technical answer of the only person who knows how this code works. Sorry if that last sentence comes awfully pretentious, but I am quite fed up with that discussion. Hopefully, once all this is settled the code will be clear enough and I will no longer be the only one knowing it. And I have a perfect right of giving a half-line answer to a question that, technically, was almost worthless, on top of being stated in a rude way. If the objections raised has any technical merit, I would have addressed them in my code, however rude the formulation. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
