On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 11:51:04 +0100 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-12-09 19:45 GMT+01:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>: > > > But users switching from FFmpeg to other software because > > it fails at the limit does happen. > > Could you elaborate? > Was there a bug report that we ignored? Reporting bugs to ffmpeg is so tedious, why would anyone do that? I think in the specific case I had in mind, imagemagick was used instead, but I could be wrong. The use-case was processing high-res scans. Surely not really a worry for ffmpeg, since it's concerned about video, and 16K video is still "a bit" in the future. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
