On 12/8/2016 12:55 PM, Mark Thompson wrote: > On 08/12/16 15:51, Mark Thompson wrote: >> Hacky fix enclosing, only compile tested. >> >> A configure test for this might be better, because we could then check it >> sensibly in the generic code and bail out earlier? (Which would permit >> software decode, this will attempt hardware decode and fail.) > > Or maybe change the current configure test to drop support for VP9 in those > versions entirely? Newer versions of libva including the field already > existed when the first hardware which could do VP9 at all through this was > released. > > - Mark
Definitely make the first version with that field the minimum in that case. The least amount of ifdeffery the better. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
