On 1 December 2016 at 17:25, Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun > > <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 30.11.2016 22:55, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun < > >> > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 30.11.2016 19:16, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > >> >> You can't just add a gap like that. > >> >> The current code assumes that the numbers are consecutive, like e.g. > >> >> the > >> >> naming of AVCOL_PRI_NB suggests. > >> > > >> > > >> > No, we've had gaps in these before. > >> > >> In AVColorPrimaries? > > > > > > I seemed to remember, looked it up and appeared to be wrong, so scrap > that > > :) > > Ok, so I can take care of the "holes" this patch would bring for lavc, > would anybody help me with the remaining occurrences (namely in lavf > and lavfi)? > -- Why do you insist on having a hole in the first place? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel