On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:53:15AM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:03:37PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> >> <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:03:27PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> Applied review.
> >> >> Please CC.
> >> >> Vittorio
> >> >>
> >> >>  libavcodec/hevc.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >> >>  libavformat/mov.c |  4 ----
> >> >
> >> > please split this in 2 patches, the libavcodec one probably should
> >> > also have its version bumped as apps might want to depend on
> >> > a libavcodec with that feature
> >>
> >> ok for the version bumb, why splitting it 2 patches though?
> >
> > making changes to 2 libs at the same time can mask bugs because
> > you cannot checkout and test the intermediate but in distributions
> > users can end up with one lib updated and the other not (within what
> > the dependancies and versions allow)
> > So i always suggest spliting non cosmetic changes into a patch per lib
> > unless i miss/forget
> 
> Well yes, but the changes in lavf only drop a log line, which is
> useless because of this patch, so imo it makes sense to keep them in
> the same diff. I'll split it if you insist though.

its ok to keep it on one patch if you prefer

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

You can kill me, but you cannot change the truth.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to