On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:07:31PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 11/28/2016 12:59 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > > L'octidi 8 frimaire, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : > >> No Nicolas. It's a reminder that this patch, as discussed and announced, > >> will > >> be pushed. > > > > And the Corleone give you reminders that they will break your legs. > > > >> I don't care about ffserver. > > > > Then do not discuss ffserver. > > I discuss project management. This is a late attempt at overriding a decision > from parties that didn't participate in the real decision making discussions. >
> This crap wouldn't fly anywhere else, but somehow, and according to you, it's > rational on ffmpeg. Why is it a problem that after announcing the removial of a feature we announce that the removial could be avoided as someone came forth and updated the code making the removial unneeded ? It should not be a unexpected course of events in a project driven by volunteers that a volunteer does some work that previously was believed noone would do (but before any more announcing really we should check and double check that all issues that need fixing were fixed and i really want everyone agreeing and being happy and ATM everyone seems in bloodrage berseker mode, while that gives us a interresting suggestion for the next release name, it doesnt make me happy at all to see everyone fight and be angry) [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be no State. -- Vladimir Lenin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
