On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Nicolas George wrote:

Le primidi 1er frimaire, an CCXXV, Marton Balint a écrit :
This reverts d300f5f6f570659e4b58567b35c9e8600c9f2956.

Further reference:
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2013-October/149935.html

I can't reproduce ticket #2899 so I am not sure the original patch is still
needed. Reverting it fixes unknown channel layout support for trivial
resamples, such as:

ffmpeg -f lavfi -i "aevalsrc=0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0:d=1,asetnsamples" -f null none

Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu>
---
 libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c b/libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c
index 3af698d..379bc1a 100644
--- a/libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c
+++ b/libavfilter/avfiltergraph.c
@@ -802,8 +802,7 @@ static int reduce_formats_on_filter(AVFilterContext *filter)
             if (inlink->type != outlink->type || fmts->nb_channel_layouts == 1)
                 continue;

-            if (fmts->all_layouts &&
-                (!FF_LAYOUT2COUNT(fmt) || fmts->all_counts)) {
+            if (fmts->all_layouts) {
                 /* Turn the infinite list into a singleton */
                 fmts->all_layouts = fmts->all_counts  = 0;
                 if (ff_add_channel_layout(&outlink->in_channel_layouts, fmt) < 
0)

This is not correct. It makes a difference if the condition you remove
is false, i.e. if !fmts->all_counts && FF_LAYOUT2COUNT(fmt): the filter
does not support unknown layouts, and you propose to give it one
nonetheless.

Okay, so the proper fix would be to make asetnsamples support unknown channel layouts? I thought it does, but as far as I see, the default, if no query_formats callback is specified is to only allow known layouts.

Wouldn't it make sense to change the default to allow unknown channel layouts as well, if no query_formats is specified?

Thanks,
Marton
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to