On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:53:40AM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> It makes no sense for this code to be inside the video filter loop, and
> the frame sample aspect ratio is even set unconditionally a few lines
> above.
> ---
> ffmpeg.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ffmpeg.c b/ffmpeg.c
> index 3b91710..7e366f2 100644
> --- a/ffmpeg.c
> +++ b/ffmpeg.c
> @@ -2180,7 +2180,6 @@ static int decode_video(InputStream *ist, AVPacket
> *pkt, int *got_output, int eo
> int i, ret = 0, err = 0, resample_changed;
> int64_t best_effort_timestamp;
> int64_t dts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE;
> - AVRational *frame_sample_aspect;
> AVPacket avpkt;
>
> // With fate-indeo3-2, we're getting 0-sized packets before EOF for some
> @@ -2316,11 +2315,7 @@ static int decode_video(InputStream *ist, AVPacket
> *pkt, int *got_output, int eo
> }
> }
>
> - frame_sample_aspect= av_opt_ptr(avcodec_get_frame_class(),
> decoded_frame, "sample_aspect_ratio");
> for (i = 0; i < ist->nb_filters; i++) {
> - if (!frame_sample_aspect->num)
> - *frame_sample_aspect = ist->st->sample_aspect_ratio;
> -
> if (i < ist->nb_filters - 1) {
> f = ist->filter_frame;
> err = av_frame_ref(f, decoded_frame);
I'll push this soon
--
Clément B.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
