2016-11-11 0:24 GMT+03:00 Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv>: > > > > sure, ffmpeg has support for many pixel formats and adding more > > pixfmts is not a problem. > > > > my best answer would be to look at commits which add other pixel > > formats and just follow how they were added to libswscale. make some > > fate tests, and it should be done. > > > > hopefully you have test samples made of these pixfmts you want to add. > > that makes testing for us easier, as we can test on multiple cpu > > arch's to make sure the code is safe and works. > > > > Sorry Compn, nothing personal here, but you are responding exactly in the > way I thought you would and why I even wrote that certain people would > encourage in spite of the technical issues. > > You don't understand the complexity of this problem either. The pixel > formats are the least of his problems. Samples don't exist, it's not a file > based format, it's a network stream etc. Please listen to what Ros and I > said, we worked on this painfully for months. > > Regards, > Kieran > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >
Hi all, I very rarely send patches to FFmpeg. Maybe I am the last one in the row to say something about the topic, but I belive it is not good idea to break motivation of contributors even the idea is good or bad or wrong. If someone wants to try, he can give a try, release a patch, it can be discussed in a discussion level. I really find saying such comments like " We don't need more broadcasting shit in ffmpeg." and "....and it is why FFmpeg is full of broken things and has a bad name in the professional world." annoying. Frankly speaking, as my own, I start to think maybe some people try to give intentional directions to FFmpeg. Belive me; Cisco, Ateme, Siemens etc. use FFmpeg in their products and solutions. For me, FFmpeg is great as its contributors. ------------- A part from the topic; there are several useful patches released but not applied yet, such as: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/attachment/ticket/4155/underflow_overflow_fix.diff http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-June/194856.html http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-November/202587.html I wanted to mention this under contributor's motivation sunbjec, maybe https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org can be used to upload missed patches. Kind Regards, Ali KIZIL _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
