On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:01:22PM +0530, Pallavi Kumari wrote: > >> The frequency components after a R->C FFT are complex numbers > >> the peak values of complex numbers are not the same as the maxima of > >> their real components > >> did the paper this is based on say anything about what is recommanded > >> to take here for the maxima? > > >> It would seem logic to me to take the magnitude of the complex numbers > >> instead of the real components individually, but that may or may not > >> be what the paper meant > >> not that we have to do what the paper says, we can in fact do something > >> entirely different if it works better > > We need points who have high peak intensity(amplitude). Hence, we require > amplitude value at frequency points (say x-axis is freq and y is > amplitude.) so, I guess taking magnitude of complex numbers is logical. > That's how people are using.
ok, do you know how to compute that or should i explain it ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB What does censorship reveal? It reveals fear. -- Julian Assange
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
