On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:27:00AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > The checkasm test fails, see trac ticket 5508. > > Also, the following tests fail due to this: > fate-vsynth1-dnxhd-2k-hr-hq fate-vsynth1-dnxhd-edge1-hr > fate-vsynth1-dnxhd-edge2-hr fate-vsynth1-dnxhd-edge3-hr > fate-vsynth1-dnxhd-hr-sq-mov fate-vsynth1-dnxhd-hr-hq-mov > fate-vsynth2-dnxhd-2k-hr-hq fate-vsynth2-dnxhd-edge1-hr > fate-vsynth2-dnxhd-edge2-hr fate-vsynth2-dnxhd-edge3-hr > fate-vsynth2-dnxhd-hr-sq-mov fate-vsynth2-dnxhd-hr-hq-mov > fate-vsynth3-dnxhd-2k-hr-hq fate-vsynth3-dnxhd-edge1-hr > fate-vsynth3-dnxhd-edge2-hr fate-vsynth3-dnxhd-edge3-hr > fate-vsynth3-dnxhd-hr-sq-mov fate-vsynth3-dnxhd-hr-hq-mov > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> > --- > > Just disabling the checkasm_check_pixblockdsp test for ppc64be, > as was done in commit e5d434 for release/3.1, does not make much sense, > as the altivec functions actually don't work...
has this been tested with actual hw or an emulator ? is this a regression ? if so since when ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
