On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:20:15 +0100 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le decadi 10 brumaire, an CCXXV, Jean-Baptiste Kempf a écrit : > > I strongly disagree with this patch too. > > We do not care about the number of people who disagree, we only care > about practical arguments. > > IIRC, the last argument on the matter was mine: > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-September/200317.html > > If you, or anyone else opposing it, has counter-arguments, please give > them. Otherwise, the patch should go in once it is clean. > I don't have the energy for such long-winded technological discussions which (predictably) lead to nothing. I just want my disagreement noted. If we have Reviewed-by etc. headers, why not Nacked-by ones? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
