On 10/31/2016 11:30 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > Le decadi 10 brumaire, an CCXXV, James Almer a écrit : >> That's a curious thing to say when we have a voting committee to >> deal with polarizing subjects that went beyond practical arguments. > > The voting committee is there for when arguments are failed: when there > are significant pros and cons on each side and deciding which one is > better and which one is worse is a matter of policy and taste and not a > technical matter. > > People who try to vote instead of giving arguments are trying to abuse > the power of the voting committee.
Afaics, the cons argumented were that this "demuxer" doesn't fit the criteria of a libavformat module. It's not demultiplexing a multimedia file. It, unless i misread it, is just reconstructing one out of a non-binary dump. This should be implemented as a separate tool using libavformat, and not as a libavformat module. See liboggz's oggz-dump tool. > > Regards, > > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
