2016-10-24 16:27 GMT+08:00 Steven Liu <lingjiujia...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> 2016-10-24 15:22 GMT+08:00 wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com>:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:52:48 +0200
>> Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Le tridi 23 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, wm4 a écrit :
>> > > XML is very complex
>> >
>> > This is the usual, and often only, argument raised in this kind of
>> > situation. And unfortunately, I already addressed it in this very
>> thread.
>> >
>> > XML is very complex, yes: processing instructions, entity definitions,
>> DTSs
>> > and schemas, namespaces, etc.
>> >
>> > Fortunately, we do not need that. Manifests only use the most basic XML
>> > features: elements, attributes, text. Parsing that is easy.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>>
>> Well, I thought the idea was already rejected by multiple people before.
>>
>
> But i think Nicolas George's idea is useful now, for example used in hds
> mkv and some format depend on simple xml format.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>
>
>
Hi Nicolas George,
I saw ffmpeg have no HDS and DASH demuxer, and all of them's format is
use xml, maybe this parser is a very useful parser, what about the basic
xml :-D
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
