On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:40:53AM +0530, Pallavi Kumari wrote: > I mean deciding a timeline for the opw project. Which is to be mentioned in > application
its your application, you can choose whatever timeline you feel makes sense. As far as iam concered whats important is to finish the qualification task well before we have to choose the applicant(s) we accept this year. The timeline for the main project in dec-mar can be segmented as you like but leave plenty of time toward the end, problems always occur and things get delayed. Also both for qualification and the main project submit code early if you have questions ask early, if you dont get satisfactory reply from me on something ask again and louder/clearer ... i do sometimes also forget to reply until i then remember again days later ... also i think the architecture wasnt discussed much yet do you have some plans about it ? I mean for example there could be a avfilter that passes audio through and adds fingerint(s) as metadata into thf AVFrame (as with avpriv_frame_get_metadatap in vf_idet.c) and also print the fingerprints via av_log() a 2nd filter could then look these fingerprints from the metadata up in some file/database a 3rd one could add the fingerprints to the file/database or these also could all be in one filter of course this can be extended in the future to for example have a filter delay the audio until lookup succeeds and then once identified lookup lyrics online and add them or such (this of course would be a future thing after outreachy/opw) but maybe you have a different plan on how the components would interact ? thx > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc > > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:06:26PM +0530, Pallavi Kumari wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > I figured out the use of fft. Help me with the time line setting. Thanks > > > > I dont understand the question, > > if its about AVFILTER_FLAG_SUPPORT_TIMELINE*, please ignore this for > > now, its not needed > > > > [...] > > -- > > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > > > Rewriting code that is poorly written but fully understood is good. > > Rewriting code that one doesnt understand is a sign that one is less smart > > then the original author, trying to rewrite it will not make it better. > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know. -- Lao Tsu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
