Hi all, Am 21.10.2016 um 10:32 schrieb Michael Behrisch: > Am 20.10.2016 um 10:00 schrieb Clément Bœsch: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: >>> Le nonidi 29 vendémiaire, an CCXXV, Clement Boesch a écrit : >>>> it's really a trivial and harmless patch. >>> >>> Which is not enough to accept it. >>> >> >> but the patch is perfectly fine and semantically more correct (it >> explicits that it's wrong to add entry afterward). >> >>> I am sure there are better uses of contributors' time than that. >>> >> >> people are free to do whatever they feel like; you're just wasting >> yours by bikeshedding about this stuff you could just ignore. >> > > So here is the patch again, this time without the line breaks, > hopefully.
does the lack of further reaction mean that the patch was rejected or does the discussion continue elsewhere? Best regards, Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
