On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Sven C. Dack <sven.c.d...@sky.com> wrote: > On 19/10/16 15:25, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> >> You seem to be referring to the license of the cuvid files, which is >> not the license actually used by the CUDA headers. The CUDA headers >> are under a full proprietary license with no such permission. > > > Are you saying the use of CUDA header files (with #include) during > compilation makes ffmpeg itself non-free software? >
Thats the general interpretation of the license situation. If you include non-free headers, your binary becomes non-free, hence why building with cuda currently requires the --enable-nonfree option. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
