2016-09-14 18:11 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: > On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >> 2016-09-14 16:42 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>: >> > Adopted from 4eb49fdde8f84d54a763cfb5d355527b525ee2bf revert. >> >> I am of course not against this patch but wasn't the reason for the >> old code in utils.c that our h264 parser has insufficiencies? > > Like what? Only h264 have those fields. Doing it outside of > parser seems strange.
I thought - and please correct me if this is wrong - that this code was always (only?) needed because our h264 parser does not do what the specification requires to correctly determine h264 timestamps. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel