On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:19:00AM -0700, Jonathan Campbell wrote:
> On 09/07/2016 04:51 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > ---
> > doc/developer.texi | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
> > index 4d3a7ae..51e3da7 100644
> > --- a/doc/developer.texi
> > +++ b/doc/developer.texi
> > @@ -641,6 +641,12 @@ are notoriously left unchecked, which is a serious
> > problem.
> > @item
> > Test your code with valgrind and or Address Sanitizer to ensure it's free
> > of leaks, out of array accesses, etc.
> > +
> > +@item
> > +Check that your submitted patch shows up on
> > @url{https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org}.
> > +Also make sure its status is updated, you can create an account and update
> > it.
> > +If your patch is incorrectly or not listed in patchwork then it might be
> > +missed by developers using patchwork to find patches needing review or
> > pushing.
> > @end enumerate
> >
> > @section Patch review process
> >
>
> I only see one of the 4 patches for AC-3 consistent noise generation (the
> libavutil version bump) on the patchwork site. Can I assume the other three
> will make their way into the patchwork list when the time is right, or did I
> submit the patch wrong?all 4 patches are there: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?submitter=82&state=%2A&archive=both patches which arent there will not appear later unless the mails from the mailing list are stuck [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and the brevity of human life -- Protagoras
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
