Hi, On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > It was proposed that we could go one step further and do parsing > > not in the demuxer step (av_read_frame) > > Personally, I use avformat demuxing with a bunch of other decoders > which might still need the parser to run first to re-package frames on > proper boundaries, so having the decoders do that instead of the > demuxers sounds like the wrong approach to me. > A demuxer should ideally output fully re-constructed packages, and not > a raw bitstream that still needs re-construction before decoding, at > least IMHO. It's a good point, we should support both external-demuxer-lavc-decoder as well as lavf-demuxer-external-decoder. That wasn't addressed in the current proposal. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
