On 8/25/2016 5:34 PM, James Almer wrote: > On 8/25/2016 12:45 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> 2016-08-24 16:55 GMT+02:00 Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com>: >>> This breaks files with legitimate single-entry edit lists, >> >>> and the hack, introduced in f03a081df09f9c4798a17d7e24446ed47924b11b, >> >> I believe "Hack" is not acceptable on this mailing list anymore, please >> remove it from the commit message. > > Care to point where this was discussed or agreed by the bulk of developers? > I don't recall anything about it. > A quick search for "hack" shows a lot of recent results in both the ML and > the git repo, so I'm not sure why you assumed it's "not acceptable" anymore.
What's a better word? "incorrect workaround"? Am I not allow to say some code is wrong? Because the code is defacto incorrect. > >> >>> has no link to any known sample in its commit message >> >> I believe a sample is linked in the original commit message, >> please remove the sentence. It is not. A filename is not a link. There is no way to locate the sample solely from the commit message. The description is accurate. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
