> On 24 Aug 2016, at 08:31, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > 2016-08-23 22:22 GMT+02:00 Oliver Collyer <ovcoll...@mac.com>: >>> On 23 Aug 2016, at 21:21, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2016-08-23 19:10 GMT+02:00 Oliver Collyer <ovcoll...@mac.com>: >>>> + AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P10LE, >>> >>> I know this is theoretical but the Nvidia header seems to indicate >>> native endianness to me, so this should be AV_PIX_FMT_YUV420P10 >>> >>>> + AV_PIX_FMT_YUV444P10LE >>> >>> But after reading the rest of the patch: >>> Shouldn't this be AV_PIX_FMT_YUV444P16? >> >> How so - the Nvidia doc is stating that the encoder is taking 10 bits per >> component, not 16? > > AV_PIX_FMT_YUV444P16 should not need any conversion and therefore > be measurably faster, the least significant bits are ignored. > Please test and report back. >
Yes, I can confirm AV_PIX_FMT_YUV444P16 works fine so I can now ditch the conversion and do a straight plane copy. Thanks Oliver > Carl Eugen > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
