On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 07:42:09PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > Hi, > > patch attached.
> vf_crop.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> fa7e5dd663b07c06f58f845cb3b519f8904e3bca
> 0001-avfilter-vf_crop-make-it-possible-to-crop-single-pix.patch
> From e9f380d9aab2f1f82183f05b91f37ec1e50bd6da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 19:38:48 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] avfilter/vf_crop: make it possible to crop single pixels from
> subsampled pixel formats
>
> ---
> libavfilter/vf_crop.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_crop.c b/libavfilter/vf_crop.c
> index 01773fa..91cb3c0 100644
> --- a/libavfilter/vf_crop.c
> +++ b/libavfilter/vf_crop.c
> @@ -184,8 +184,6 @@ static int config_input(AVFilterLink *link)
> s->w_expr, s->h_expr);
> return AVERROR(EINVAL);
> }
> - s->w &= ~((1 << s->hsub) - 1);
> - s->h &= ~((1 << s->vsub) - 1);
this might be unexpected for people that use expressions
like w:h*aspectwhatever
as they could get odd sized videos which might have issues playing
on some devices
I agree that when litteral numbers are specified the change makes
sense
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
