Sorry for the noise, I made some poor assumptions. First, I wasn’t really paying attention when it mentioned the whitespace errors on apply, and didn’t correct them the first time. Second, I didn’t realize that it would ignore my —subject directive when sending the revised first patch. Now I learn that there is an —annotate switch. More knowledge for the future.
The second patch depends on the first, since the relevant metadata is in a COMM frame.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
