Dan Parrot <dan.parrot <at> mail.com> writes: > The dataset used was the entire FATE regression suite.
I don't think this is a particularly useful testcase: It takes very long but mostly tests other things. Did you test if using ffmpeg -benchmark -f rawvideo -i /dev/zero... showed different results? I believe this should be both easier and faster to test. > name: rgb24ToY_c_vsx. > no. of calls: 9999. min: 3832 ns. avg: 4709 ns. max: 37550 ns. > total: 47093533 ns. > > name: rgb24ToY_c. > no. of calls: 9999. min: 3809 ns. avg: 4707 ns. max: 29041 ns. > total: 47072923 ns. Without any data, I would have thought that this is the most important function (and "no. of calls" seems to confirm this). Why is this not faster? Can you confirm with START_TIMER / STOP_TIMER that there is no gain? Thank you, Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
