Le quartidi 14 prairial, an CCXXIV, kl222 a écrit : > I understand your usage scenario. But I am not specified snapshot file > name on the command line. But it needs to be updated it is, another > program specified file name. So, I think as a separate filter is better.
I think you will need to do a little better than that: you can not wave the objections to your patch away, you need to explain why they are less important than your wish of specifying the output file name on the command stream. IMHO, they are not: the calling code can as easily rename the output file to its final name. I might add that having an output file name specified through a command channel is at least a security concern: since it is a rarely used feature, people will often forget it exists when auditing new code. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
