Hi,

On 30.05.2016 17:43, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Thomas Volkert <si...@gmx.net> wrote:

From: Thomas Volkert <tho...@netzeal.de>

---
  libavformat/Makefile     |  1 +
  libavformat/rtpenc.c     | 14 +++++++++++++
  libavformat/rtpenc.h     |  1 +
  libavformat/rtpenc_vp9.c | 54
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  libavformat/sdp.c        |  4 ++++
  5 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 libavformat/rtpenc_vp9.c
No opinion on the patch itself yet, but I'm wondering if you've tested this
under real conditions with the built-in and libvpx-based decoders? I'm
Yes.

asking because IIRC the built-in ffvp9 decoder doesn't deal with missing
references well at all (it just bails out), so it might be that under real
My tests showed this behavior, too.
Is it possible to improve the decoder with acceptable effort to overcome this limitation?

network conditions, it doesn't work all that well...

(That doesn't disqualify the patch in any way, but it would be good to
document somewhere for people trying to use this.)
I think the sender part is not the right position.
Where should we place such a hint?

Best regards,
Thomas.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to