On 5/19/16, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/19/2016 11:43 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> patch attached.
>>
>>
>> 0001-avcodec-adpcm-pick-correct-step_index-for-IMA-AMV.patch
>>
>>
>> From 78dc1f23509f59e64adbc0a4ecf2e6b77581e375 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 16:40:07 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] avcodec/adpcm: pick correct step_index for IMA AMV
>>
>> Fixes #5538
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> libavcodec/adpcm.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/adpcm.c b/libavcodec/adpcm.c
>> index 0b6b92e..ac74318 100644
>> --- a/libavcodec/adpcm.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/adpcm.c
>> @@ -1310,8 +1310,8 @@ static int adpcm_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx,
>> void *data,
>> break;
>> case AV_CODEC_ID_ADPCM_IMA_AMV:
>> c->status[0].predictor = sign_extend(bytestream2_get_le16u(&gb),
>> 16);
>> - c->status[0].step_index = bytestream2_get_le16u(&gb);
>> - bytestream2_skipu(&gb, 4);
>> + c->status[0].step_index = bytestream2_get_byteu(&gb);
>> + bytestream2_skipu(&gb, 5);
>> if (c->status[0].step_index > 88u) {
>> av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "ERROR: step_index = %i\n",
>> c->status[0].step_index);
>
> No fate change? Coverage shows this code is tested.
Yes, fate passes.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
