On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:00:21PM +0100, Josh de Kock wrote: [...] > Should I be replacing sdl.c instead of creating sdl2.c? This comes > under a more semantic question: should it be called SDL2?
I'd say replace sdl.c and use .name = "sdl,sdl2"? It would be a shame to keep the SDL1 dependency and configure garbage just because of a mostly unused libavdevice output. -- Clément B.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
