On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:39:20PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote: > From: Matthieu Bouron <matthieu.bou...@stupeflix.com> > > --- > > Hello, > > Here are some benchmark on a rpi2 of the attached patch. > > ./ffmpeg -f lavfi -i > sine=440,aformat=sample_fmts=fltp,asetnsamples=4096,abench=start,aresample=48000,abench=stop > -t 1000 -f null - > > With patch: avg=0.001159 speed=44,1x > Without patch: avg=0.001297 speed=40,8x > > ./ffmpeg -f lavfi -i > sine=440,aformat=sample_fmts=s16p,asetnsamples=4096,abench=start,aresample=48000,abench=stop > -t 1000 -f null - >
> With patch: avg=0.001374 speed=45,6x > Without patch: avg=0.000782 speed=64,6x so its slower ? or am i misreading this ? either way, passes fate here, cant comment beyond that [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
