On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:40:04AM +0300, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 05:07:10AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > doesnt this require an update to teh docs ?
>
> Indeed, thanks for commenting.
>
> But I wonder how should I format reference to "aspect" correctly and pretty.
> Now I have come up with this, which I think is not perfect. Any help is very
> appreciated.
>
> --- a/doc/codecs.texi
> +++ b/doc/codecs.texi
> @@ -456,6 +456,9 @@ Possible values:
> @item aspect @var{rational number} (@emph{encoding,video})
> Set sample aspect ratio.
>
> +@item sar @var{rational number} (@emph{encoding,video})
> +Set sample aspect ratio. Alias to @var{aspect}.i think this is ok if noone has a better idea (i dont have one) [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
