On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 at 14:59 Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:

> Mark Thompson <sw <at> jkqxz.net> writes:
>
> > Unless someone can show what created this file and that
> > it might make more, I suggest that the hack workaround
> > should be removed.
>
> Is there a valid file affected by the applied patch?
> It is very important that FFmpeg also decodes invalid
> files as long as no valid files are affected.
>

Nonsense, should FFmpeg be able to decode any file created by using netcat
on random RTP data?
Should FFmpeg be able to decode wireshark dumps which contain MPEG-TS?
...
etc

Kieran
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to