On 04/16/16 11:00 AM, Dmitriy Kuminov wrote:
On 2016-04-16 17:24:12 +0000, Dave Yeo said:

Actually I now get this at the beginning of the configure run, using a
ramfs.ifs volume for $TMPDIR,

[K:\usr\local\src\ffmpeg.obj]sh ../ffmpeg/configure --enable-gpl
--disable-doc --samples=/usr/local/share/fate-suite --cpu=i686
--extra-libs=-lpoll --prefix='r:/tmp/ffmpeg' --disable-static
--enable-shared
ln: failed to create symbolic link `R:/tmp/name_VJhuEZNf': Operation not
supported on socket

Hmm, interesting use case. I bet this is because ramfs.ifs has some
problems with EAs (which are needed for proper symlink support on OS/2).
Looks like a ramfs.ifs bug to me.

While ramfs.ifs has a few shortcomings, it dies support 64kbs of EAs, which shouldbe enough for most uses. Perhaps the problem is lack of DosFindNotify() or file locking.


And yes, it seems that the master branch uses ln_s not only in DLL
creation but also to symlink to src in the shadow build tree (I was
checking against the 2.8 branch before where it was not used). It,
however, contains a fallback code that should cover the failure in your
case (if I read it right). So I still think we should remove ln_s
redefinition via cp on OS/2 in FFmpeg. In case of a proper IFS (I have
JFS here but HPFS is also fine) symlinking src works like a charm
(performed a full build).


The problem is that symlinks on OS/2 (unless using TVFS.IFS) are inherently fragile. It just takes one utility that is not aware of them to break things and not everything is linked against kLIBC. In FFmpegs case we use lxlite, which is a Pascal program and knows nothing of symlinks. I personally prefer to only use symlinks when needed, such as _virtualenv, and currently using my older environment can often pass all the FATE tests, whereas the new environment has more failures. As leaving it in doesn't hurt your use case anyways, my vote is to leave it in.
Dave
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/history.cgi?slot=x86.os2.446
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/history.cgi?slot=x86.os2.492



_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to