On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:49:50PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 4/12/2016 11:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > either way, IMO the latest version should be default (its compatible > > just has more fields) > > Except for the sidedata addition i sent last night, which adds one or more > hashes to a given frame's line, the new output is indeed compatible to what > has been version 1 for a long while. It shouldn't break parsing scripts. >
> Should i then make that be the only change under version 2? i was thinking about that too. .... yes possibly [..] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Frequently ignored answer#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML. And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
