On 6 April 2016 at 12:04, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2016 at 06:45, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote: > >> >> Mmh. That's nice and all but... why not use/adjust the native ebur128 >> filter we have instead of relying on an external library? >> >> > What's worse is that this patch is around 1100 lines of code but the > library is around 1300 lines (which from a quick look can be trimmed down > to around 1/4 of that) and the library depends on libspeex.
speexdsp* and it's not required, from what I can tell. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel