Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:15 AM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:12:09 +0000 > Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote: > > > > > > > Yes. Well, AGPL extends the definition of distribution to include use > over > > > the network. > > > > > > Would we need then to send a copy of the AGPL to every viewer of our > > channels? > > How do we even know who they are when it's a terrestrial (OTA) broadcast? > > Should we just send one to every citizen on earth just in case? > > Permanently overlay a text rendering of the AGPL over the channel. > > No really, why do you want your lib to be AGPL? It only causes problems. I want to ++ this, because it will get ignored. Aaron: we really encourage you to work on j2k, but we also encourage you to do so with a more liberal license (e.g. GPL, or possibly even LGPL) for the final product. AGPL is a bloody pain. Why do you want AGPL so much? Did the so-called loophole hurt you personally in some way? Or is this all theoretical? Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
