May I push the patch? 2016-03-28 16:21 GMT-03:00 Pedro Arthur <bygran...@gmail.com>:
> It was a little typo, attached patch fixed. > > 2016-03-28 16:09 GMT-03:00 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>: > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0300, Pedro Arthur wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > This patch removes the previous swscale code which where under the >> '#ifndef >> > NEW_FILTER'. >> > It also remove a few unused fields of SwsContext. >> > Seems it doesn't introduce any regression (passes all FATE tests) but it >> > would be better if someone could test it more. >> >> > input.c | 2 >> > output.c | 40 ++--- >> > ppc/swscale_altivec.c | 4 >> > slice.c | 4 >> > swscale.c | 336 >> +++---------------------------------------------- >> > swscale_internal.h | 10 - >> > utils.c | 78 ----------- >> > vscale.c | 4 >> > x86/swscale.c | 38 +---- >> > x86/swscale_template.c | 12 - >> > 10 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 463 deletions(-) >> > fbdf78f3edb890f485d5bcfc2b3edf55465db1f5 sws_cleanup.patch >> > From d52cb0e25332a0327acdac89256beac4701f675a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: Pedro Arthur <bygran...@gmail.com> >> > Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:25:18 -0300 >> > Subject: [PATCH] swscale: cleanup unused code >> > >> > Removed previous swscale code under '#ifndef NEW_FILTER' >> > and removed unused fields of SwsContext >> >> fails to build on x86-32 here >> >> libswscale/x86/swscale.c: In function ‘ff_sws_init_swscale_x86’: >> libswscale/x86/swscale.c:460:18: error: ‘SwsContext’ has no member named >> ‘needApha’ >> >> [...] >> >> -- >> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB >> >> The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal. >> -- Aristotle >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
