Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger <at> gmx.de> writes:

> > +    if (s->avctx->width & 3)
> > +        bytestream2_skip(&g2, 4 - (s->avctx->width & 3));
> 
> Maybe it's more reliable/clear to keep like that

Yes, it definitely is imo;-)

> but I think this could also be written as
> bytestream2_skip(&g2, -s-≥avctx->width & 3);

> Should be fine otherwise I think.

Thank you, patch applied.

Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to