On Mar 22, 2016 8:59 AM, "Hendrik Leppkes" <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Aaron Boxer <boxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Hendrick > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Aaron Boxer <boxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL. > >> > If I were to integrate this into FFMpeg, would I then have to > >> > re-release FFMpeg under Affero GPL ? > >> > > >> > >> AGPL is evil, please keep it out of FFmpeg. > >> > > > > Would you mind telling me more about why you feel AGPL is evil ? > > > > The problem with a license like the AGPL is that its inherently > incompatible with anything else. > Heck, you couldn't even build a non-free build with AGPL components, > because non-free only governs distribution of the binary, but AGPL has > extra conditions for things like being reachable over the network. > > Its a nightmare to combine with anything else. >
Thanks. What is a non-free build? _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
