Am 21.03.16 um 11:41 schrieb wm4: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:34:11 +0100 > Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote: > >> Am 21.03.16 um 08:23 schrieb wm4: >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:49:18 +0100 >>> Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> trying to handle software fallback more consistently for videotoolbox and >>>> probably other hardware accelerations. >>>> >>>> Addresses ticket #5352 where software fallback is demanded which has been >>>> removed on purpose before. With this patch the user can configure the >>>> desired >>>> behaviour. >>>> >>>> -Thilo >>> >>> Please explain how a hwaccel that uses no hardware decoding makes any >>> sense at all. >> >> Checking compliance, comparing output/performance, work around a possible >> bug in >> an alternative decoder... of course it is no alternative if you need/want the >> benefits of hardware decoding but there are use cases that come to mind. >> And maybe you don't have an alternative decoder at hand... > > But it's integrated as hwaccel, so most of these arguments don't make > too much sense to me. Please don't touch the hwaccel thing, and wait > until there's a separate videotolbox decoder.
Indeed, if this decoder is actually coming it voids the need for this change. Have I missed it on -devel already? -Thilo _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
